Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 14-3971(D), the Motor Vehicle Division shall transfer title of a motor vehicle from the decedent to the successor or successors on presentation of an affidavit stating that thirty days has passed since the decedent’s death, and either (1) an application or petition for the appointment of a personal representative is not pending and a personal representative has not been appointed in any jurisdiction and the value of all personal property in the decedent’s estate is less than $50,000 as valued as of the date of death or (2) the personal representative has been discharged or more than one year has passed since a closing statement has been filed and the value of all personal property in the decedent’s estate is less than $50,000 as valued as of the date of the affidavit. In addition, the claiming successor must be entitled to the vehicle.
To make the transfer, you will need to turn in the certificate of title to the Motor Vehicle Division along with a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate, Title and Registration Application form, and the Non-Probate Affidavit for Obtaining Title to the Vehicle of an Arizona Decedent which can be found here
A.R.S. 14-3971
Disclaimer
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Estate Planning Attorney Francis X. Morrissey, Jr. Has Been Disbarred
Photo Credit: daylife
On January 6, 2010, I wrote about Anthony D. Marshall, son of Brooke Astor, and his sentence of 1 - 3 years in prison for defrauding his mother as she suffered from Alzheimers. A co-defendant, Francis X. Morrissey, Jr., a lawyer who did estate planning for Mrs. Astor, was also convicted of a series of fraud and conspiracy charges, as well as one count of forging Mrs. Astor’s signature on an amendment to her will. That blog entry can be read in its entirety here
By operation of law, Francis X. Morrissey, Jr. (pictured above) has now been disbarred.
Matter of Morrissey
Disclaimer
Labels:
Anthony D. Marshall,
Brooke Astor,
Francis X. Morrissey,
fraud,
Jr.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Types of Wills Recognized by the State of Arizona
The Arizona Code recognizes holographic wills, attested wills, and self-proved wills. To be valid, a will must comply with the execution formalities of either a holographic will or an attested will. A holographic will does not require witnessing, but it must be signed by the testator, and the material provisions (which would include the identity of the testator's property and the beneficiaries chosen to receive that property) must be in the testator's handwriting.
An attested will must be in writing and signed by the testator and at least two witnesses. The will does not have to be signed by the testator in the presence of the witnesses, and the witnesses do not have to sign in the presence of the testator or each other. However, the testator must then tell the witnesses that the signature on the document is, indeed, the testator's or that the document constitutes the testator's will.
Most attorneys continue to execute an attested will with greater formality by having the testator sign in the presence of two witnesses, who then sign the will in the testator's presence at his or her request, and in the presence of each other. This helps prevent any question about the validity of the will if it must be probated in another state.
The advantage of a self-proved will is most evident in the event of a will contest. Formalities of execution are conclusively presumed if a self-proved will is contested in a formal testacy proceeding. An attested will may be self-proved either at the time of the original execution or later. Regardless of when an attested will is made self-proved, the process involves an acknowledgment by the testator and affidavit of the witnesses before a notary public. There are statutory requirements regarding the content of the language that must be included at the end of the will if it is to be self-proved.
Disclaimer
An attested will must be in writing and signed by the testator and at least two witnesses. The will does not have to be signed by the testator in the presence of the witnesses, and the witnesses do not have to sign in the presence of the testator or each other. However, the testator must then tell the witnesses that the signature on the document is, indeed, the testator's or that the document constitutes the testator's will.
Most attorneys continue to execute an attested will with greater formality by having the testator sign in the presence of two witnesses, who then sign the will in the testator's presence at his or her request, and in the presence of each other. This helps prevent any question about the validity of the will if it must be probated in another state.
The advantage of a self-proved will is most evident in the event of a will contest. Formalities of execution are conclusively presumed if a self-proved will is contested in a formal testacy proceeding. An attested will may be self-proved either at the time of the original execution or later. Regardless of when an attested will is made self-proved, the process involves an acknowledgment by the testator and affidavit of the witnesses before a notary public. There are statutory requirements regarding the content of the language that must be included at the end of the will if it is to be self-proved.
Disclaimer
Arizona Homestead Allowance, Exempt Property Allowance, and Family Allowance
Under Arizona law, if the decedent was domiciled in Arizona, the surviving spouse can claim a Homestead Allowance in the amount of $18,000. If there is no surviving spouse, each minor child and each dependent child is entitled to an equal share of the $18,000. The surviving spouse is also entitled to an Exempt Property Allowance in the amount of $7,000. If there is no surviving spouse, each minor child and each dependent child are entitled jointly to the $7,000. Finally, a surviving spouse, as well as minor and dependent children, are entitled to a Family Allowance, which is a "reasonable allowance" for maintenance during the period of administration. Similar to owning a share in community property, this protects against disinheritance by the testator since they are rights conferred by statute. In addition, because these allowances take precedence over creditors' claims except expenses of administration, they can protect the family of the deceased against creditors.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
Monday, February 8, 2010
Lawyers On Call - Free Legal Advice for Arizonans
On March 2, 2010, the topic for Lawyers On Call will be tax law. See the State Bar of Arizona web site for more information.
State Bar of Arizona
Disclaimer
State Bar of Arizona
Disclaimer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)